Appeals & Judicial Reviews
Convicted or given a harsh sentence? Our Stern Shapray Criminal Lawyers team represents clients in criminal appeals judicial reviews, challenging convictions, and sentences with skilled, strategic legal advocacy.
A criminal conviction or harsh sentence can feel like the end of the road—but in many cases, it’s just the beginning of the next legal step.
If you believe that your trial was unfair, your sentence was excessive, or your rights were violated during the legal process, you may have grounds to file an appeal or request a judicial review.
At Stern Shapray Criminal Lawyers, we represent clients in criminal appeals and judicial review proceedings at both the provincial and appellate levels. These are complex, high-stakes legal matters that require deep knowledge of legal procedure, persuasive written advocacy, and a strategic mindset. Our team is equipped to evaluate the strength of your case and pursue every available avenue for a second chance.
Challenging Convictions Appeals Judicial Reviews
Appealing a conviction means asking a higher court to examine whether a legal error occurred during your trial that affected the outcome. Common appeal issues include:
- Misinterpretation or misapplication of the law
- Improper admission or exclusion of evidence
- Judicial bias or misdirection to the jury
- Ineffective assistance of counsel
- Breaches of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
A successful conviction appeal may result in:
- A new trial
- A complete acquittal
- Substitution of a lesser offence
Not every unfavourable outcome qualifies for appeal—timing, procedural requirements, and the legal basis must be thoroughly assessed. We provide a full review of your trial record and transcripts to determine the best path forward.
Challenging Sentencing Decisions
Even if a conviction is not appealed, you may still challenge the sentence imposed. Sentencing appeals focus on whether the sentence was:
- Excessive or disproportionate
- Outside the appropriate sentencing range for the offence
- Inconsistent with sentencing principles (rehabilitation, deterrence, etc.)
- Based on incorrect information or procedural errors
In many cases, appellate courts have reduced custodial sentences, removed ancillary orders (such as DNA or firearm bans), or replaced jail with conditional sentences when appropriate.
We can help craft a compelling written argument supported by legal precedent and sentencing statistics, giving you the best chance at a more just and balanced outcome.
Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions
Not all unfair decisions come from a criminal trial. Judicial review is a legal process used to challenge decisions made by administrative bodies—such as:
- Parole Board decisions
- Professional regulatory boards
- Security clearance denials
- Police disciplinary rulings
- Immigration inadmissibility findings
These reviews are brought before the B.C. Supreme Court and focus on whether the decision-making process was lawful, fair, and reasonable—not simply whether the decision was favourable.
We assist clients with:
- Assessing whether judicial review is the right course of action
- Drafting persuasive judicial review applications and affidavits
- Representing clients in hearings before the court
Why Legal Representation Matters
Appeals and judicial reviews are time-sensitive and highly technical. Deadlines are short, and the success of your case depends on precise legal arguments and a deep understanding of the original proceedings.
At Stern Shapray, we approach these matters with the detail, dedication, and advocacy they deserve—because one decision should not define your future.