Driving Offences

We were successful on the challenge to this 90 Day Driving Prohibition where the client blew a fail reading on two samples taken at the roadside. Driving prohibition was revoked on the basis that there was insufficient evidence about the proper calibration of the screening devices and thus uncertainty about the validity of the test results.

Successful challenge to 90 Day IRP in case involving an issue about the identity of the driver of the vehicle. We successfully persuaded the adjudicator that the police were mistaken about who was driving and the driving prohibition was revoked.

90 Day driving prohibition involving allegation of refusal to provide a breath sample at the roadside. Factual challenge to the IRP with affidavits filed and medical letter resulting in driving prohibition being revoked.

Impaired driving charges withdrawn and client entered a plea under section 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act to driving without due care and attention. – NOT GUILTY

Impaired driving charges in case involving a one car accident dropped with plea to offence under section 144 of the motor vehicle act. – NOT GUILTY

Impaired driving charges dropped by prosecutor after pre-trial discussions regarding numerous issues in the case. – NO CRIMINAL RECORD

Client in Dawson Creek facing charge of Driving Over 80 has charges reduced to driving without due care under the Motor Vehicle Act – no criminal record and client permitted to enter into a probation order which allows him to drive for work purposes. – NOT GUILTY

Alberta client charged with impaired driving in B.C. We were retained and negotiated with prosecutor resulting in plea under the Motor Vehicle Act – no criminal record and no alberta driving prohibition. – NOT GUILTY

T found driving while disqualified as a result of a previous impaired driving conviction. P facing multi-year driving prohibition if convicted plus possible jail sentence. Judge agrees with defence argument that insufficient evidence in crown’s case. – NOT GUILTY