Client was charged with Fraud Over $5,000 and Forgery for making false insurance claims. Mr. Beckett persuaded the Crown to agree to simply drop the charges. – NOT GUILTY
Fraud Charges Theft and Property Offences
At Stern Shapray, we provide legal representation across a wide range of criminal and quasi-criminal matters, from serious charges to regulatory and provincial offences.
R. v. K.A.F.
R. v. R.P.
Client was charged by indictment with Fraud Over $5,000 for using her employer’s credit cards and Amazon accounts to make unauthorized purchases for herself. Mr. Beckett persuaded the Crown to agree to Alternative Measures. – NOT GUILTY
R. v. D.D.
Client was charged with Mischief Over $5,000 for causing significant damage to an acquaintance’s vehicle. Mr. Beckett persuaded the Crown to agree to Alternative Measures. – NOT GUILTY
R. v. E.O.
Client was charged by indictment with Fraud Over $5,000 for making false insurance claims. Mr. Beckett persuaded the Crown to agree to Alternative Measures. – NOT GUILTY
R. v. C.H.
Client was charged with Mischief Under $5,000 for causing property damage to her ex-boyfriend’s vehicle. Mr. Beckett was able to persuade the Crown to drop the client’s charges. – NOT GUILTY
R. v. M.R.
Client was charged with theft under $5,000 after being caught on camera and by loss prevention for shoplifting from a department store. Mr. Beckett was able to persuade the Crown to drop the client’s charges. – NOT GUILTY
R. v. S.D.
Client was charged by indictment with mischief for causing property damage of over $5,000 after a night of drinking. Mr. Beckett was able to persuade the Crown to drop the client’s charges. – NOT GUILTY
R. v. A.S.
Client was charged by indictment for theft from his employer in an amount over $5,000. The client was not a Canadian citizen and faced potentially significant immigration consequences if he was convicted. Mr. Beckett was persuaded the Crown to drop the client’s charges. – NOT GUILTY
R. v. M.H.
Female client charged with multi-year fraud involving misappropriation of funds in her role as a bookkeeper. We employed a delay and counseling strategy which permitted client to obtain valuable counseling and make partial repayment of stolen funds. Client had prior criminal record but still received conditional sentence after our extensive submissions at the sentencing hearing.